My search for the Greek New Testament

"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened."

- The New Testament, "The Gospel According to St. Matthew," Chapter 7, Verses 7 and 8 (as translated by the King James Version of the Bible)

Many of you have heard that I am learning Ancient Greek, and that part of the reason for doing so is to be able to read the New Testament in the original. I was curious to see how hard it is to obtain a copy of that online (emphasis on "copy" - not to be confused with original manuscripts), and so I typed it into Google. I discovered that there are a large variety of different editions, some published by one group, some by another. This was a bit of a problem, as I needed to commit to one version for price reasons, and it's hard to know which one to pick.

My favorite superhero

Batman has always been my favorite superhero. This is not to say I haven't enjoyed other superheroes as well - I loved the old Superman movie with Christopher Reeves growing up (sad about his accident), and I loved the Spider-Man movies that came out in my adolescence (or at least the first and second - I wasn't such a big fan of the third). But my favorite hero has always been Batman.

Some thoughts about third parties, refusing to vote, and choosing the lesser of two evils

I'm a believer that sometimes one has to choose the lesser of two evils, because no good choice is then available. But I've heard it argued that choosing the lesser of two evils is "choosing evil." This is a problematic claim, because when no better choice is available, choosing the lesser of two evils is the option that will minimize evil the most, and is thus the most anti-evil (and most pro-good) choice available.

Another problematic argument is that refusing to vote is "the greatest political statement you can make" (in the words of an old friend of mine). The context of this argument was that it shows you will not support either candidate. But refusing to support any candidate for president is often to allow the worst of the two candidates to enter office, as happened in the last election. The real political statement made is "I don't want a say in what happens in my government," and this is a statement that few civic-minded people would ever want to make.

Another problematic solution is to vote for a third-party candidate. Since the advent of political parties in the Founding Fathers' time, there have been over fifty presidential elections; but only in three of them have new parties entered the White House, and all of them were prior to the Civil War. Third-party candidates gaining the White House is thus extremely rare; and unless the polls show massive support for a third party, the chances of a third party actually gaining the White House are quite remote. Sorry, Ron Paul supporters: third-party candidacy would seem unrealistic to me.

Thus, voting for the best (or least bad) of the two main candidates is the best option that is realistically available. The best candidate to vote for in the last election was Mitt Romney.

Did the Founding Fathers oppose political parties? (Actually, no ... )

A few problems with “The Communist Manifesto”

"A spectre is haunting Europe - the spectre of communism. All the Powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this specter ... Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as Communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the Opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of Communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries? Two things result from this fact: I. Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be itself a power. II. It is high time that Communists should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Spectre of Communism with a Manifesto of the party itself."

- Opening lines of "The Communist Manifesto" (1848)

I was recently told that I should write a blog post about why Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were wrong - arguing not on values as I did in another post (though there is a place for that as well), but on facts and theories, challenging their dubious factual and theoretical claims.

Karl Marx

Friedrich Engels

In discussing problems with Marxism, where does one start?

To someone who's read and understood their book "The Communist Manifesto," that might seem easy - and in some ways, it is. But in trying to debunk it, I had one big problem: where to start. Despite "The Communist Manifesto" being a tiny book (which I read through in a day), it sometimes seems when I'm reading the book like its two authors were having a competition to see who could cram more fallacies into a small amount of space. And they both won.

Marx and Engels

Discussion of Marxist fallacies is practically a genre in its own right ...

I intend this blog post to be a short one, so I will only be able to summarize this book's problems. But if you're after a more thorough treatment of its fallacies, this is practically a genre in its own right, so there are lots of works to choose from.

My positive experience with psychology

One of the great surprises of my education was how much I liked psychology. This would have surprised me in my younger days, as I thought of psychology in terms of counseling and clinical psychology - things that I would not have been good at. To be sure, those things are a part of psychology, but psychology was so much more than that, something I little suspected in my youth.

Why I am learning Ancient Greek

"I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last."

- The New Testament, "The Revelation of St. John the Divine," Chapter 22, Verse 13 (as translated by the King James Version of the Bible)

I've actually had the desire to learn Ancient Greek for a long time, but I didn't think I'd ever have the time or the opportunity to do it. I took an ethics class from NAU's philosophy department in May 2009 where we talked about the Greek philosopher Plato, and I posted on the 28th of that month that I "want[ed] to learn Ancient Greek."

Plato

But I never thought that I'd actually have the opportunity to do it. I thought: "I don't think I'll ever live near someplace where they offer a class in it. Only one university in Arizona has a Classics department, and that's U of A (which is 3 ½ hours away)."

But I recently realized that with a dead language, taking a class in the subject isn't as important, since I won't be needing to speak or listen to the language. If reading it is enough, I can learn it from a book. So it recently occurred to me to get a textbook about it, and start teaching myself Ancient Greek.

Did the Founding Fathers oppose political parties? (Actually, no … )

It has often been argued that the Founding Fathers were against political parties. Some of them undoubtedly were, but others of them actually founded political parties. These included John Adams and Alexander Hamilton (founders of the Federalist Party), and Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (founders of the Democratic-Republican Party). They weren't always called political parties - often they would use less controversial language like "the political friends of Mr. Hamilton" or "the political friends of Mr. Jefferson." But they were parties in every sense of the word.

George Washington

Critics of political parties make much out of George Washington's opposition to them. But it's easy to oppose political parties when your self-interest doesn't require their support, and George Washington is the only presidential candidate who was ever elected without the support of a political party. His reputation for walking away from power, along with his remarkable war record, made it so he didn't need parties. All he had to do was not say he wouldn't be president, and he would be elected. Most of the other founders, by contrast, did need their support, and actively courted it to gain political office.

A review of Melvyn Bragg's “The Adventure of English” (ITV)

"What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet."

- William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" (1597), Act II, Scene ii

I did not like most of my English classes growing up. This is ironic, considering I wanted to be a fiction writer, but with the notable exception of seventh grade (and English 101 in college), I found my English classes less than inspiring. So it might have come as a surprise to me that I would one day enjoy a documentary about the history of the English language. But enjoy it I did, and I felt inspired to write a post about it here.

Our Constitution

A document may not seem
To be of much worth.
But one of them is among
The best of things on Earth.

It is our Constitution.
It helps to make us free.
Let's go through it a bit,
And many dear rights see.

Miracle at Philadelphia

A miracle occurred in Philadelphia on September 17, 1787. The United States Constitution was signed.

It was the product of four long months of heated debate, signed by forty men who disagreed with each other on many issues. Fifteen of the men present at the convention refused to sign, and some worked against the Constitution, whipping up public sentiment against it. They made many charges against it, including that it had no national Bill of Rights. They and the proponents of the Constitution debated for months afterward over the ratification of the document. But almost a year after the delegates in Philadelphia had signed the Constitution, it was finally ratified by the States. The country created a national Bill of Rights a few years later, by passing ten amendments.

Adam Smith and the American Revolution

"The rebellious war now levied is become more general, and is manifestly carried on for the purpose of establishing an independent empire. I need not dwell upon the fatal effects of the success of such a plan. The object is too important, the spirit of the British nation too high, the resources with which God hath blessed her too numerous, to give up so many colonies which she has planted with great industry, nursed with great tenderness, encouraged with many commercial advantages, and protected and defended at much expence of blood and treasure."

"It is now become the part of wisdom, and (in its effects) of clemency, to put a speedy end to these disorders by the most decisive exertions. For this purpose, I have increased my naval establishment, and greatly augmented my land forces ... "

- King George III's Address to Parliament, 27 October 1775

"The Wealth of Nations" was published in 1776, a year usually associated with America

Adam Smith was the first modern economist. Thus, his publishing of "The Wealth of Nations" in the year 1776 is often seen as symbolic. Like the American war of independence, "The Wealth of Nations" was a revolution - although not in politics or war, but in economic thinking. It is the first modern work on economics, and is rightly respected today for its influence ... and brilliance.

But Adam Smith was a Scotsman, and was thus British

But because the symbolism of the year is associated with America, it's easy to assume that Adam Smith was an American. Actually, he was a Scotsman, and was thus British - a citizen of the very mother country we were at war against. Because of this, you might think that he was unsympathetic to our war of independence. But as someone who has studied "The Wealth of Nations," I can tell you that this is not the case. He actually was sympathetic with the American Revolution, and I can prove this with some quotes from the book.

Movies I've watched with foreign-language subtitles

Specifically, Spanish and French subtitles

A review of “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” (1939 film)

"Your friend Mr. Lincoln had his Taylors and Paines. So did every other man who ever tried to lift his thought up off the ground. Odds against them didn't stop those men - they were fools that way. All the good that ever came into this world came from fools with faith like that. You know that, Jeff. You can't quit now - not you! They aren't all Taylors and Paines in Washington. That kind just throw big shadows, that's all. You didn't just have faith in Paine or any other living man. You had faith in something bigger than that. You had plain, decent, everyday, common rightness; and this country could use some of that. Yeah, so could the whole cockeyed world - a lot of it!"

- Clarissa Saunders, a character in the movie

So I was recently watching the movie "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington" with my family. This is my second-favorite Hollywood movie, after the Christian classic "Ben-Hur." I love the patriotism of this movie, because patriotism is like a religion for me.

The Founding Fathers and the History Channel

The History Channel has made a few documentaries about the lives of the Founding Fathers. There is one in particular that I would like to talk about here, which is their three-hour program simply entitled "Founding Fathers."

My interest in modern languages

I was actually interested in foreign languages from a very early age. I thought: "How cool would it be to speak another language?" I suppose that many monolingual kids fantasize about being able to speak another language, usually without the slightest clue of how hard it is to do so. But for me, the interest never waned, and the only thing limiting me was the opportunity.

How I learned to play piano (the way I play it)

"I never had much interest in the piano until I realized that every time I played, a girl would appear on the piano bench to my left and another to my right."

- Duke Ellington, jazz pianist and composer

I have often been asked how I learned to play piano the way I play it, so I wrote this explanation of how I acquired my style. I also talk a little bit about my piano influences.

Me in my youth with my piano teacher

Some thoughts on separation of church and state

It has recently struck me how many liberals have spoken in favor of getting rid of laws with a religious basis. In the name of separation of church and state, many liberals try to get rid of laws against gay marriage by pointing to the religious basis of many arguments supporting them.

This seems to me a fundamentally flawed interpretation of separation of church and state, for the following reason: Many laws supported by atheists and agnostics are, for many people, grounded in religious belief. The Ten Commandments say "Thou shalt not kill" (the basis of laws against murder), "Thou shalt not steal" (the basis for laws against theft), and "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor" (the basis for laws against perjury). If we were to discard any law with a religious basis, we would have to do away with laws against theft, perjury, and murder, which are supported largely on the basis of religion. The harm to society of doing such is self-evident, and so clearly, discarding laws with a religious basis is unwise.

My passion for history

"History is about high achievement, glorious works of art, music, architecture, literature, philosophy, science and medicine - not just politics and the military - as the best of politicians and generals have readily attested. History is about leadership, and the power of ideas. History is about change, because the world has never not been changing, indeed because life itself is change ... History is the course of human events. And it must therefore be, if truthful, about failure, injustice, struggle, suffering, disappointment, and the humdrum. History demonstrates often in brutal fashion the evils of enforced ignorance and demagoguery. History is a source of strength, a constant reminder of the courage of others in times more trying and painful than our own."

- David McCullough's "The Course of Human Events" (2003)

Most of my Facebook and Blogger friends have seen my posts about history. Whether it's talking about the latest historical book or documentary that I've watched, or noting the anniversary of an important historical event, or even posting about a major historical individual on their birthday, I love posting about history. A few people have given me positive feedback on these historical posts.

But I have never, as yet, talked publicly about how I got interested in history. At the risk of boring my readers, I will now share some of the story about how I acquired my passion for history.

My favorite history documentaries

Ancient history

Egypt's Golden Empire (PBS Empires) - 2 ½ hours

Michael Wood's In Search of the Trojan War (BBC) - 6 hours

The Greeks: Crucible of Civilization (PBS Empires) - 2 ½ hours

Bettany Hughes' The Spartans (shown on PBS) - 3 hours

Bettany Hughes' Athens: The Dawn of Democracy (shown on PBS) - 2 hours

Michael Wood's In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great (BBC) - 4 hours

Rome: Rise and Fall of an Empire (History Channel) - 10 hours

Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of an Empire (BBC, requires code-free DVD player) - 6 hours

The Roman Empire in the First Century (PBS Empires) - 3 ½ hours

The Germanic Tribes (German-made) - 4 hours

Art history

Great Epochs of European Art: Art of the Ancient Greeks & Romans (German-made) - 2 hours

The Dark Ages: An Age of Light (BBC) - 4 hours

Kenneth Clark's Civilisation (BBC) - 11 hours

The Medici: Godfathers of the Renaissance (PBS Empires) - 4 hours

Civilizations (BBC, shown on PBS) - 9 hours


Religious history

The Buddha: The Story of Siddhartha (PBS) - 2 hours

Kingdom of David: The Saga of the Israelites (PBS Empires) - 4 hours

Simon Schama's The Story of the Jews (shown on PBS) - 5 hours

Jerusalem: Center of the World (PBS) - 2 hours

How the Celts Saved Britain (BBC) - 2 hours

Ancient Roads from Christ to Constantine (shown on PBS) - 5 ½ hours

The Life of Muhammad (BBC, shown on PBS) - 3 hours

Islam: Empire of Faith (PBS Empires) - 3 hours

Martin Luther (PBS Empires) - 2 hours

David Starkey's Henry VIII: Mind of a Tyrant (requires code-free DVD player) - 3 hours

David Starkey's The Six Wives of Henry VIII - 3 hours


The Middle Ages

Byzantium: The Lost Empire (The Learning Channel) - 3 ½ hours

The Dark Ages (History Channel) - 1 ½ hours

Michael Wood's In Search of the Dark Ages (BBC, requires code-free DVD player) - 6 hours

Vikings: The Real Warriors (BBC) - 3 hours

The Normans (BBC, requires code-free DVD player) - 3 hours

The Normans: The Complete Epic Saga (privately made) - 3 hours

The Crusades (BBC) - 3 hours

The Crusades: Crescent and the Cross (History Channel) - 3 hours

The Plague (History Channel) - 1 ½ hours (often available as bonus feature for The Dark Ages)

The Plantagenets (BBC, requires code-free DVD player) - 3 hours

Britain's Bloodiest Dynasty: The Plantagenets (British-made) - 4 hours

Britain's Bloody Crown (British-made) - 3 hours

The Wars of the Roses: A Bloody Crown (British-made) - 2 hours

The Stuarts & The Stuarts in Exile (BBC, this part is technically post-Middle-Ages, requires code-free DVD player) - 5 hours


History of the British Isles generally

Simon Schama's A History of Britain (BBC, with American financing) - 15 hours

David Starkey's Monarchy (U. K.) (British-made) - 17 hours

Michael Wood's Story of England (BBC) - 6 hours

Frank Delaney's The Celts (BBC) - 6 hours

Neil Oliver's A History of Scotland (BBC Scotland) - 10 hours

Huw Edwards' The Story of Wales (BBC Wales) - 6 hours

Fergal Keane's The Story of Ireland (BBC Northern Ireland) - 5 hours

Andrew Marr's Modern Britain 1901-2007 (BBC - requires code-free DVD player) - 10 hours


Specific countries and regions (outside of the British Isles)

Alistair Cooke's America: A Personal History of the United States (BBC, requires code-free DVD player) - 10 hours

Canada: A People's History (CBC and Société de Radio-Canada) - 32 hours

Australia: The Story of Us (Australian-made - requires code-free DVD player) - 6 hours

Africa's Great Civilizations (PBS) - 6 hours

Michael Wood's The Story of India (BBC) - 6 hours

Michael Wood's The Story of China (BBC) - 6 hours

Japan: Memoirs of a Secret Empire (PBS Empires) - 2 ½ hours


History of the English language

Melvyn Bragg's The Adventure of English (British-made) - 6 hours


Famous reigning queens

David Starkey's Elizabeth (Elizabeth the First, British-made) - 3 hours

Catherine the Great (PBS) - 2 hours

Queen Victoria's Empire (PBS Empires) - 3 ½ hours


Early Latin America

In Search of History: The Aztec Empire (History Channel) - 1 hour

Breaking the Maya Code (PBS) - 2 hours

Michael Wood's Conquistadors (BBC, shown on PBS) - 4 hours


Colonial America

Secrets of the Dead: Jamestown's Dark Winter (PBS) - 1 hour

The Pilgrims (PBS) - 2 hours

The Seven Years' War (French and Indian War)

The War That Made America (PBS) - 4 hours


The American Revolution (the War of Independence)

Overviews of the war

Liberty! The American Revolution (PBS) - 6 hours

History Channel's "The Revolution" - 10 hours

Rebels & Redcoats: How Britain Lost America - 4 hours

American Revolution biographies

Muffie Meyer's Benjamin Franklin (PBS) - 3 hours

George Washington the Warrior (History Channel) - 1 ½ hours

Marquis de Lafayette: The Lost Hero (PBS) - 1 hour

Alexander Hamilton (PBS) - 2 hours

Founding Fathers (History Channel) - 3 hours

Founding Brothers (History Channel) - 3 hours

John and Abigail Adams (PBS) - 2 hours

Thomas Jefferson (PBS, Ken Burns) - 3 hours


Frontier exploration

Lewis and Clark (PBS, Ken Burns) - 4 hours


The French Revolution/Napoleonic Era

Versailles (French documentary, with episode about King Louis XVI - requires code-free DVD player) - 9 hours

Marie Antoinette (PBS) - 2 hours

The French Revolution (History Channel) - 1 ½ hours

Napoleon (PBS Empires) - 4 hours


The War of 1812 (North America)

The War of 1812 (PBS) - 2 hours - available online

Dolley Madison (PBS) - 1 ½ hours

Andrew Jackson: Good, Evil, and the Presidency (PBS) - 2 hours - available on YouTube


The Mexican-American War

The U.S.-Mexican War 1846-1848 - 4 hours - available on YouTube - link to first half

The Gold Rush - 2 hours


The American Civil War

The Abolitionists (PBS) - 3 hours

The Civil War (overview by PBS, Ken Burns) - 11 hours

Reconstruction: The Second Civil War (PBS) - 3 hours

Civil War biographies

Abraham and Mary Lincoln: A House Divided (PBS) - 6 hours

Jefferson Davis (privately made) - 3 ½ hours

Ulysses S. Grant (PBS) - 3 ½ hours


Various other topics

The Congress (PBS, Ken Burns) - 1 ½ hours

Modern Marvels: The Suez Canal (History Channel) - 1 hour

Transcontinental Railroad (PBS) - 2 hours

Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony (PBS, Ken Burns) - 3 hours

Murder of a President: James A. Garfield (PBS) - 2 hours

Mark Twain (PBS, Ken Burns) - 3 ½ hours

New York Underground (PBS) - 1 hour

Crucible of Empire: the Spanish-American War (PBS) - 2 hours

The Boer War (British-made - requires code-free DVD player) - 1 ½ hours

TR: The Story of Theodore Roosevelt (PBS) - 3 ½ hours

Horatio's Drive: America's First Road Trip (PBS, Ken Burns) - 2 hours

Panama Canal (PBS) - 1 ½ hours

The Great San Francisco Earthquake (PBS) - 1 hour

War of the Worlds (PBS) - 1 hour

Ken Burns' Hemingway (PBS) - 6 hours


History of American business

The Men Who Built America (History Channel) - 6 hours

The Gilded Age (PBS) - 2 hours

The Circus (PBS) - 4 hours

Joseph Pulitzer: Voice of the People (PBS) - 1 ½ hours

Edison: The Father of Invention (PBS) - 2 hours

Tesla: Master of Lightning (PBS) - 1 ½ hours

Citizen Hearst (PBS) - 3 ½ hours

Empire of the Air: The Men Who Made Radio (PBS, Ken Burns) - 2 hours

Henry Ford (PBS) - 2 hours - available online

Walt Disney (PBS) - 4 hours

Silicon Valley (PBS) - 1 ½ hours


World War One

The Great War (BBC, interviews veterans) - 17 hours

World War One (CBS, the complete story) - 10 hours

The Great War (PBS, focuses on America) - 6 hours

Biographies of major figures

Woodrow Wilson (PBS) - 3 hours

Coverage of particular portions of the war

The Storm That Swept Mexico (PBS) - 2 hours - available on YouTube

The Irish Rebellion 1916 (PBS) - 3 hours

Lawrence of Arabia: The Battle for the Arab World (PBS) - 2 hours

Influenza 1918 (PBS, American Experience) - 1 hour

Paris 1919: Inside the Peace Talks That Changed the World (Canadian-made) - 1 ½ hours


World War Two (my main posts and my other posts)

The Road to War (BBC) - 3 hours

War of the Century: When Hitler Fought Stalin (BBC) - 3 ½ hours

Allied powers

ANZAC: Australians at War in World War Two (Australian-made) - 10 hours

Canada at War (Canadian-made, World War Two) - 6 hours

The War (PBS, Ken Burns) - 15 hours (focuses on United States in World War Two)

BBC History of World War II - 30 hours (technically a collection of different World War II documentaries)

The World at War (British-made, World War Two) - 23 hours (an actual unified history, which talks about the major powers on both sides)

Axis powers

The Nazis: A Warning from History (BBC) - 5 hours

Horror in the East: Japan and the Atrocities of World War II (BBC) - 1 ½ hours

Auschwitz: The Nazis and the "Final Solution" (BBC) - 5 hours

Biographies of Allied leaders

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (PBS) - 4 hours - available online

Eleanor Roosevelt (PBS) - 2 ½ hours

Winston Churchill (British-made) - 3 hours

Harry Truman (PBS) - 4 hours - available online

Dwight D. Eisenhower (PBS) - 2 ½ hours


The Cold War (other)

The Cold War (CNN) - 18 hours

The Korean War (Timeless Media Group) - 5 hours

The Vietnam War (PBS, Ken Burns) - 18 ½ hours

Cold War political biographies (other)

John F. Kennedy (PBS) - 3 ½ hours

Robert F. Kennedy (PBS) - 2 hours

Lyndon B. Johnson (PBS) - 3 ½ hours - available online

Richard Nixon (PBS) - 2 ½ hours - available online


Ethnic history

Black in Latin America (PBS) - 4 hours

Native America (PBS) - 3 ½ hours

Asian Americans (PBS) - 5 hours

The Jewish Americans (PBS) - 6 hours

The Latino Americans (PBS) - 6 hours

The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross (PBS) - 6 hours

Jackie Robinson (PBS, Ken Burns) - 4 hours

The Long Walk of Nelson Mandela (PBS Frontline) - 2 hours

General American history in the 20th century

Baseball (PBS miniseries, Ken Burns) - 19 hours

Jazz (PBS miniseries, Ken Burns) - 19 hours

A review of "Canada: A People's History"

"It shall be lawful for the Queen, by and with the Advice of Her Majesty’s Most Honourable Privy Council, to declare by Proclamation that, on and after a Day therein appointed, not being more than Six Months after the passing of this Act, the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick shall form and be One Dominion under the Name of Canada; and on and after that Day those Three Provinces shall form and be One Dominion under that Name accordingly."

- Canada's "Constitution Act of 1867," also known as the "British North America Act 1867"

I would like to offer my American perspective to this 32-hour Canadian series. I hope Canadians will not mind. I got this series because I was interested in the history of America's northern neighbor. Canada is one of the United States' biggest trading partners, and being interested in doing trade with Canada, and able to speak both French and English, I thought it would be helpful to know something about Canadian history and culture.

This documentary did not disappoint. It was dramatic and interesting, and I learned much about Canadian history. Having read from many online comments that even Canadians learned something about their history by watching this series, I am struck by its informative and educational power. It is also very moving in places, with great acting, music, and narration. Those looking to learn something about the country will not be disappointed.

The Battle of the Plains of Abraham, a major battle in the Seven Years' War - Quebec, 1759

(an important year in Canadian history, because it was the year that Canada became British)

Some thoughts on patriotism

I often find patriotism a difficult subject to talk about, for a number of reasons. For one, both major parties profess patriotism. While I acknowledge that there are Democrats with great love for our country, I have found patriotism to be far more common among Republicans, and well-meaning policies from even the most patriotic of Democrats often do great harm to the country. In addition, I have heard a number of liberals say disparaging things about this country, which always fills me with disgust. This is in marked contrast to the solemn pride that most conservatives feel about their association with this country.

To be sure, I respect patriotism and love of country in all nations, and I have a great love of a number of other countries. This love includes an admiration of their culture, and a fascination with their history. But as far as countries go, I have only one true love, and that is America. To her I shall be forever loyal, and my heart will always sing her praise.

My love-hate relationship with economics

"Let's start with what economics isn't.  Economics isn't a meal ticket to make lots of money in the stock market, although economics helps you understand how stock markets and other markets work. Economics also isn't a business degree, although economics teaches important business skills. Economics, first and foremost, is a social science.  As such, economics helps to explain the mysteries of how people and society operate ... Economics is defined as the study of how people choose to use their scarce resources in an attempt to satisfy their unlimited wants."

- A webpage that influenced my decision to study some economics in college

I did not fall in love with economics, the way that I fell in love with history and politics. This is not to say that I didn't like the subject, but it didn't excite me in the same way. There are parts of it that I find quite fascinating, and others that I find quite boring. But it is definitely one of my interests, and I'll talk a little bit here about my love-hate relationship with economics.

How I got interested in politics

"I must study politicks and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematicks and philosophy. My sons ought to study mathematicks and philosophy, geography, natural history, naval architecture, navigation, commerce and agriculture, in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, musick, architecture, statuary, tapestry and porcelaine."

- John Adams, in a letter to his wife Abigail Adams (12 May 1780)

Most of those I associate with online have seen my political posts. I was particularly politically active during the last two elections, and people saw that I could be outspoken about the subject. Some have witnessed political arguments I have gotten into, and seen the debater side of me.

My interest in politics is no secret, and I have said that my blog is "part history, part politics, and part random other stuff." But I have not posted before about how I got interested in politics. At the risk of boring my friends, I will now share some of the story about how I got interested in politics.

Bill Clinton, the first president I really remember

My favorite Western film (Lewis and Clark)

I have seen a lot of great Westerns, but my favorite in the genre is not a Hollywood film at all, but a four-hour Ken Burns documentary called "Lewis and Clark: The Journey of the Corps of Discovery."

Confessions of a Facebooker

It's probably been suspected by some, but I plan the vast majority of my Facebook statuses weeks in advance. With some posts (like those about historical anniversaries), I even plan months in advance, and schedule them for particular days.

A Senator at the gates of heaven

While walking down the street one day a United States Senator is tragically hit by a truck and dies. His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.

"Welcome to heaven," says St. Peter. "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we're not sure what to do with you."

"No problem, just let me in," says the man.

"Well, I'd like to, but I have orders from higher up. What we'll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity."

"Really, I've made up my mind. I want to be in heaven," says the Senator.

"I'm sorry, but we have our rules."

Frederick Douglass: The forgotten antislavery leader

"Sincerely and earnestly hoping that this little book may do something toward throwing light on the American slave system, and hastening the glad day of deliverance to the millions of my brethren in bonds - faithfully relying upon the power of truth, love, and justice, for success in my humble efforts - and solemnly pledging my self anew to the sacred cause - I subscribe myself, FREDERICK DOUGLASS. Lynn, Massachusetts, April 28, 1845."

- Concluding words of the Appendix to the "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, Written By Himself"

Have you ever wondered what American slavery was like? If so, you'd be hard-pressed to find a better answer to this question than the "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, Written By Himself." This book was written by a former slave to influence Americans to oppose the "peculiar institution" of slavery.

Young Frederick Douglass

My late grandfather's medal citation

Grandpa Wells during World War II

*****

The Secretary of the Navy
Washington

The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the BRONZE STAR MEDAL to

PRIVATE FIRST CLASS WELLS P. MC GREGOR, UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS RESERVE

for service as set forth in the following

CITATION:

Benjamin Franklin: Renaissance Man

"I may as well confess it, since my denial of it will be believed by nobody ... perhaps I shall a good deal gratify my own vanity. Indeed, I scarce ever heard or saw the introductory words, 'Without vanity I may say,' etc., but some vain thing immediately followed. Most people dislike vanity in others, whatever share they have of it themselves; but I give it fair quarter wherever I meet with it, being persuaded that it is often productive of good to the possessor, and to others that are within his sphere of action; and therefore, in many cases, it would not be altogether absurd if a man were to thank God for his vanity among the other comforts of life."

- "The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin," section covering 1706-1757

Few men epitomize the concept of the "Renaissance Man" better than Benjamin Franklin. He achieved great success in many different fields; including the occupations of being a writer, journalist, postmaster, scientist, and inventor. He had a great wit, and had a persuasive ability that was part logical argument and part masterful diplomacy. And his achievements as a statesman are notable even by the lofty standards of America's Founding Fathers.

I certainly do not claim to be an expert about his life, but after watching a three-hour PBS documentary about him, I was inspired to read his famous autobiography. I have read it cover to cover, and "The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin" is now one of my favorite books. It was one of the first American books to be taken seriously by Europeans as literature.